![]() |
||||||||
| There are many advantages to having an attorney prepare and file your trademark application on your behalf. The primary reason is that an attorney is more likely to prepare a sound application with the broadest legal rights. Unlike copyright applications in which the breadth of your legal is decided by the copyrighted work itself, the wording on a trademark application can determine the breadth of your legal right. The Trademark Office has an interest in keeping applications very narrowly defined, restricting your trademark rights, while attorneys are trained to push the envelope in the wording of the application in order to maximize your trademark rights. Experienced attorneys also know how to avoid the myriad of fatal mistakes in the selection and preparation of specimens, and other application details. Another good reason to hire an attorney to prepare your application is that only an attorney can give you legal advice when there are difficulties processing your application. If you haven't used an attorney for the registration, you will pay by the hour for this advise. Problems and rejections are very common. If you want to determine how frequently such legal advise may be needed, you can scan the Trademark Office database and look at how many applications were rejected. Our attorneys have filed literally hundreds of trademark applications and can prepare your application to protect your trade or service mark -- whether it be in use or filed under an intent to use. Having a qualified attorney file your application ensures that your mark is property entered in the correct categories for goods and services so that you can obtain the broadest protection possible. After the USPTO determines that the minimum filing requirements have been met, the application is forwarded to an examining attorney. This may take a number of months. The examining attorney reviews the application to determine whether it complies with all applicable rules and statutes and includes all required fees. A complete examination includes a search for conflicting marks, and an examination of the written application, the drawing, and any specimen. After an application is filed, the assigned examining attorney will search the USPTO records to determine if a conflict, i.e., a likelihood of confusion, exists between the mark in the application and another mark that is registered or pending in the USPTO. To find a conflict, the marks do not have to be identical, and the goods and/or services do not have to be the same. It may be enough that the marks are similar and the goods and/or services related. If a conflict exists between your mark and a registered mark, the examining attorney will refuse registration on the ground of likelihood of confusion. If a conflict exists between your mark and a mark in a pending application that was filed before your application, the examining attorney will notify you of the potential conflict. Having a qualified trademark attorney at this point in the process is invaluable as our attorneys are very knowledgeable on the current state of the law and your legal options. |
||||||||
| DISCLAIMER These materials have been prepared for informational purposes only and are not legal advice. This information is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, a lawyer-client relationship. Internet subscribers and online readers should not act upon this information without seeking professional counsel. Do not send us information until you speak with one of our lawyers and get authorization to send that information to us. |
||||||||
| Copyright © 2004 by Carr & Associates. All rights reserved. You may reproduce materials available at this site for your own personal use and for non-commercial distribution. All copies must include this copyright statement. |
||||||||